DialysisEthics2_Forum
Other => Historical Posts => Topic started by: admin on September 01, 2009, 07:12:15 AM
-
Seattle Times
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 1
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 6:36 am Post subject: Charges brought against a Neph for overcharges
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<
> seattletimes.nwsource.com...ser26.html
********************************************************************************
Bill Peckham
Joined: 06 Jan 2003
Posts: 65
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:19 am Post subject: Just sad
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this quote was very telling:<
>"U.S. Attorney John McKay has defended the investigation, saying it sent a "strong message" to doctors at the UW and all teaching hospitals that they must comply with the rules."<
><
>They destroyed Dr. Couser's reputation, disrupted patient care and added significant costs to the UW's Nephrology program so they could send a message. They truth is they could have found the same billing discrepancies at most University teaching hospitals. Dr. Couser didn't gain financially, the nephrology program benefited, a program that provides alot of chairity care in this community. <
>
********************************************************************************
Practicing
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 1
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:53 am Post subject: Wrong is wrong
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He still can practice. Some physicians are not that fortunate.