Open menu
  • Home
  • Discussion
  • Testimonials
  • Information
  • Memorials
  • About Us
  • Contact
DialysisEthics2.org

Main Menu

  • ***HQ-Save-the-Billionaires-or-not-Walk-updates***
  • US Senate Testimony
  • Reuse is Abuse-2017
  • Questions for Kent Thiry
  • Kent Thiry (former Davita CEO) meets comedian John Oliver (2017)
  • Kent Thiry (former CEO of Davita) meets The Judge (2022)
  • Colorado Tech Bill 2007-2012-2019
  • Testimonals
  • Message Board
  • Information
  • Memorials
  • About DialysisEthics
  • *HELP* and Contact info
  • Articles

Articles and Resources

  • Healthcare Solutions
  • Our Concerns
  • Healthcare Legislation
  • Links to Other Resources
  • Diabetes Care on IHateDialysis.com
  • Dr. Bays and the ESRD Networks
  • Save the Billionaires Walk and Petition

Living Donor

Find a donor! (click image)
living donor
article
  1. You are here:  
  2. Home
  3. Articles
  4. Blog

Health Co-op Offers Model for Overhaul

Details
Written by: Super User
Category: Blog
Published: 04 April 2023
Hits: 874

Petition
Intro

By Kevin Sack

SEATTLE As Dr. Harry J. Shriver III examined 70-year-old Eleanor L. Riley one recent morning, he seemed in no hurry. He asked about her phlebitis and her gall bladder, and whether her gout was acting up. They discussed her blood pressure readings and whether she was getting any exercise.

“I surprise my patients by asking, ‘Is there anything else you want to talk about today?’ ” said Dr. Shriver, chief of a clinic near Seattle run by Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. “They’ve never heard a doctor say that.”

Dr. Shriver has the time because Group Health, one of the country’s few surviving health insurance cooperatives, has recently embraced electronic medical records and a collaborative model of primary care, allowing him to practice proactive medicine for the first time in years.

On Capitol Hill, those innovations have made Group Health a prototype for a political compromise that could unclog health care negotiations in the Senate and lead to a bipartisan deal. After a month of brainstorming, including briefings from Group Health executives, the Senate Finance Committee seems poised to propose private-sector insurance cooperatives instead of a new government health plan as its primary mechanism for stoking competition and slowing the growth of medical costs.

But state officials say Group Health’s impact on holding down costs has been mixed. And its successes may have less to do with its governance by a board that is elected by patients than with its ownership of a vast network of clinics and specialty care centers.

Above all, Group Health’s physicians are paid a salary and can earn bonuses of up to 20 percent for high-quality performance. Unlike most doctors, who are paid by the visit or procedure, they have little incentive to churn patients through and order unnecessary tests and operations.


At Group Health, doctors are rewarded for consulting by telephone and secure e-mail, which allows for longer appointments. Patients are assigned a team of primary care practitioners who are responsible for their well-being. Medical practices, and insurance coverage decisions, are driven by the company’s own research into which drugs and procedures are most effective.

As Congress and the White House debate a national health care overhaul, many in Washington agree that one reason health premiums have grown at four times the rate of inflation this decade is a dearth of competition. In 40 of 42 states studied by the American Medical Association last year, the two largest health insurers claimed at least half of all enrollment.

The question is how best to invigorate the system. Republicans and some moderate Democrats are concerned that competition from a government-run insurance plan would eventually drive private companies out of business and leave government as the sole insurer.

If the bill now being finalized by the Finance Committee includes cooperatives, it could set up a confrontation with the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which has written legislation to create a government plan along the lines of Medicare.

House Democrats also prefer a public plan, as does President Obama. But Mr. Obama has signaled that he might settle for cooperatives if it would gain Republican support for the broader legislation.

There is much about the Group Health model that Congress and the White House would like to replicate. Whether that requires a cooperative structure is open to debate.

A number of company officials acknowledged that it is Group Health’s ability to directly manage its doctors that really drives innovation. The cooperative structure’s primary contribution, they said, is to create a consumerist ethos that keeps the company focused on patient care.

“There’s a kind of accountability to the patients in our system,” said Scott Armstrong, president of Group Health. “And when you bring the principles of a cooperative to bear, patients feel responsibility for holding the system together and for their own health.”

But Carolyn A. Watts, a health economist at the University of Washington, said the cooperative structure made little difference. “In the end, it’s not about who owns the place,” she said. “It’s about the incentives.”

Technically, Group Health Cooperative was misnamed when it was founded by trade unionists and Grange members in 1947. Structured as a not-for-profit corporation, its revenues ($2.6 billion last year) are reinvested rather than distributed among members. But it is governed like a cooperative and calls itself one because its board consists of and is elected by members.

With 550,000 enrollees in Washington, Group Health is the smallest of three major insurers in the state, with a 9 percent market share. It often does raise premiums by less than its competitors, but that does not mean the increases have been insignificant. Annual increases for individual policies have averaged 12.3 percent since 2000, peaking at 24.2 percent in 2003.

Mike Kreidler, formerly a Group Health optometrist and now Washington’s insurance commissioner, said governance by consumers had sometimes translated into generous benefits. “They haven’t had the dramatic impact on cost in this market that you might have anticipated,” he said.

Group Health is a rare survivor among the hundreds of rural health insurance cooperatives that formed in the 1930s and 1940s in the face of fierce resistance from organized medicine. But there is a feeling in Seattle that it has endured only by becoming more like its competitors.

In the 1980s, it ended the practice of charging all enrollees the same premiums, regardless of their health status, and it has since introduced deductibles, co-payments and out-of-network benefits. Only seven-tenths of 1 percent of enrollees voted in the last board election.

Senator Kent Conrad, a North Dakota Democrat who first proposed cooperatives as a compromise last month, said the Finance Committee was debating how a national network might be structured and how much seed money would be needed for state and regional branches. Mr. Conrad has said it would take up to $4 billion, while others have projected $10 billion.

Mr. Conrad estimates that cooperatives would need at least half a million members, about the size of Group Health in its 62nd year, to wield meaningful leverage. That scale will be possible, he said, if the Democrats succeed in bringing tens of millions of the uninsured into the market by mandating coverage and subsidizing premiums.

But supporters of a public plan argue that it will be a challenge to form pools that large any time soon. They predict that cooperatives will become dumping grounds for the sickest patients, and that they will have difficulty forming networks of physicians.

“The idea that these things will spontaneously erupt all over the country is just completely a dream,” said Timothy S. Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University.

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/health/policy/07coop.html

Blog #6: Solutions - part 2 (a deeper dive)

Details
Written by: Super User
Category: Blog
Published: 04 April 2023
Hits: 1780
  • Tag: BillionaireRedemptionOrNot Blog

Intro
HQ-Save-the-Billionaires-Walk-updates+info  Alert: printable flyer now available!!!
Petition (and see our visit to DC and DC Press Conference + Rally)

!!!P.S. The following History and recent Children's stats linked to, need to be emphasized!!! Update: And it gets worse:  KIDS!!!!

-----------------------------------------------------

In the last blog it was mentioned there were 1600 electric utility companies in the US vs. 2 dialysis companies (basically).  The utilities have quite a hodgepodge of different business structures like Cleveland's community-owned Cleveland Public Power to large for-profit utilities.  One business structure that stood out were cooperatives.  There are more than 900 electric utility co-ops in the US!  And what is the stated mission of these co-ops? "To power communities and empower members to improve the quality of their lives.  And what is the mission of a for-profit company?  "Increase your return on investments" "generate more sales and revenues or raise your prices".  That last mission statement just doesn't have the same ring as the first does it?

Wouldn't it be nice if the medical field had their form of co-ops?  Actually they do, they are called care cooperatives.  And it has been said about them: "Local cooperative health organizations can and do provide top-quality integrated, coordinated care".  An example is Seattle's Group Health.  Here are blurbs from this article:

"“I surprise my patients by asking, ‘Is there anything else you want to talk about today?’ ” said Dr. Shriver, chief of a clinic near Seattle run by Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. “They’ve never heard a doctor say that.”

"Above all, Group Health’s physicians are paid a salary and can earn bonuses of up to 20 percent for high-quality performance. Unlike most doctors, who are paid by the visit or procedure, they have little incentive to churn patients through and order unnecessary tests and operations."

____________________________________________________________________________

And from a PBS article:

"One of the reasons Campbell (a patient) is a big fan of the Seattle-based HMO is because it's a cooperative. Its policies are determined by consumers like Campbell, who subscribe to a Group Health medical plan, either through their employer or on their own. Each policyholder can vote for the board of trustees at an annual meeting. And it is consumers who actually sit on the board."

"Although there is no specific plan of how such a national co-op would work, the idea is to create an organization where consumers review policies and can hire or fire the CEO. It's a concept that works well at Group Health, according to its CEO, Scott Armstrong."

____________________________________________________________________________

So what happened to medical care co-ops?  Good question!  That might take more digging.

Petition (and see our visit to DC and DC Press Conference + Rally)

 

Blog #5: Solutions - part 1(break them up!)

Details
Written by: Super User
Category: Blog
Published: 04 April 2023
Hits: 909
  • Tag: BillionaireRedemptionOrNot Blog


Intro
Petition (and see our visit to DC and DC Press Conference + Rally)

!!!P.S. The following History and recent Children's stats linked to, need to be emphasized!!! Update: And it gets worse:  KIDS!!!!

--------------------------------------------------------

This site has managed to point out a lot of problems in kidney dialysis, what may get lost is solutions.  A person can look to one area that might not seem obvious at first - utilities.  Both carve out a small geographical area and aren't subject to a lot of competition.  Both have seen their share of problems when the for-profit motive is factored in (Dennis Kucinich's 'Division of Power and Light' is an excellent read).  However what differs is the number of different companies in each field.  A quick search shows there are 1600 electric utility companies in the United States!  So what about kidney dialysis - there are basically two companies.  And I don't know how things are in other parts of the country, but where I'm at the lights stay on for the most part.  The kidney dialysis companies have seen more than their share of problems. 

I have to wonder what would happen if we only had two for-profit utility companies in the US.  Would they become so powerful and influential they would be allowed to basically police themselves?  (the fox watching the hen house) Would it be lights out like in kidney dialysis?

And if for example there was a problem with our electricity in my area, who would we have a better chance against - a smaller regional carrier, or a big national corporation!  I would prefer taking on the little guy!

I'll finish by saying dialysis state inspection teams - not the feds - have kept many a patient alive!  And I wouldn't be surprised to find out my state's utility commission has been a big part in keeping my lights on!

In these two cases smaller seems better.

Petition (and see our visit to DC and DC Press Conference + Rally)

Seattle Health Cooperative May Offer National Model

Details
Written by: Super User
Category: Blog
Published: 03 April 2023
Hits: 642

DE2

  

(Whole article)
The success of the Seattle-based medical provider, Group Health, has put new attention on whether a cooperative health plan can work on a national level. Betty Ann Bowser reports.
'Group Health'

Robert Wood Johnson


JIM LEHRER: And next tonight, we continue our coverage of the health care reform debate. NewsHour correspondent Betty Ann Bowser has a Health Unit report on a Seattle medical co-op that's been in the national headlines lately. Our Health Unit is a partnership with the Robert Wood Johnson foundation.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: Just weeks after being treated for blood clots in his legs, 72 year old Jerry Campbell was out biking in his Seattle neighborhood. He gives much credit for his rapid recovery to his medical provider: Group Health.

One of the reasons Campbell is a big fan of the Seattle-based HMO is because it's a cooperative. Its policies are determined by consumers like Campbell, who subscribe to a Group Health medical plan, either through their employer or on their own. Each policyholder can vote for the board of trustees at an annual meeting. And it is consumers who actually sit on the board.

JERRY CAMPBELL, board member, Group Health: What we do is monitor the policies that are set up, approve the policies that are set up. Here is how Group Health is going to operate. Here is the strategic plan. Here are the expectations. And then we monitor meeting those expectations on a monthly basis. What's the quality look like? Are we doing the things we need to do? How are we doing with our people?

BETTY ANN BOWSER: Recently, Group Health has gotten a lot of attention in the national health care reform debate, since lawmakers in the other Washington think a patient-governed health insurance company might be politically more viable than a government-run option.

DOCTOR: We will investigate that more and then we will be able to figure out why you're becoming more anemic.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: Although there is no specific plan of how such a national co-op would work, the idea is to create an organization where consumers review policies and can hire or fire the CEO. It's a concept that works well at Group Health, according to its CEO, Scott Armstrong.

SCOTT ARMSTRONG, chief executive officer, Group Health: The result is, as you can imagine, there's a kind of accountability that my management team and I feel to our patients, not to shareholders, not to purchasers, but to patients, which does define how Group Health prioritizes its investments.

NURSE: So, this is for your blood pressure. It's going to give your arm a little hug.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: Armstrong says it's that kind of consumer influence that actually leads to providing better care and ultimately healthier patients. But not everyone agrees co-ops are the answer. University of Washington public health professor Aaron Katz.
            
"An evidence-free idea"

AARON KATZ, University of Washington: I think this is an evidence-free idea. I don't think there's much evidence that the existence of co-ops in any market has transformed those markets just because of their existence. And there are so many ways that the health care insurance market is dysfunctional that just plopping down a new organization is not going to transform it in a way that will produce what we want, which is good, effective, efficient care for people when they need it.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: In fact, premiums for individuals and businesses are only incrementally lower at Group Health than other area insurance companies. And they have been rising rapidly, 13 percent last year alone.

Still, Group Health says it has been transforming the marketplace in ways that are not reflected in premium rates, by integrating health care delivery with prepayment of services.

That idea was so radical back in 1947, when Group Health was started, the medical establishment often called the organization "Group Death." Its doctors were considered communists, and weren't allow to practice at many area hospitals.

It's come a long way from those days. The not-for-profit now has 600,000 members and is the third largest health care provider in Washington State. In fact, one criticism of Group Health is that it's become so corporate, it's not much different than its privately-owned counterparts. But Group Health says it is unique because it combines insurance with the delivery of health care. And, although lawmakers haven't indicated that a national co-op would do that, CEO Armstrong says it should.
   
Doctor incentives

SCOTT ARMSTRONG: You need to have the insurance functions, the financing component of what we typically imagine health insurance to look like. But our view is that you have to connect that then to the care delivery system in order to create the reform, the alignment, the innovations in the care system.

DR. BARBARA DETERING, family practice physician: How are you today? Good?

BETTY ANN BOWSER: The reforms include hiring doctors as employees, and putting a strong emphasis on family practice medicine.

DR. BARBARA DETERING: As we get older, we actually need exercise more than we did when we were young.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: Barbara Detering has been a physician with Group Health for 18 years. She says, in a single day, she may only see six or seven patients in traditional office visits. But she will communicate with many more via e-mail and in lengthy phone calls.

DR. BARBARA DETERING: So, I got the message from Terri that you called in and you are not kind of emotionally feeling really good.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: And patients can always access their medical records online from home. She says that leads to healthier patients who are more actively involved in their own care.

DR. BARBARA DETERING: You know, I also get incentivized for good patient satisfaction scores. And if my patients feel like I'm rationing their care and not giving them what they need, I would get horrible scores, you know? So, we are incentivized to have good patient care from their perspective.

BETTY ANN BOWSER: So, in plain English, does that mean you get a bonus at the end of the year if your patients have good outcomes?

DR. BARBARA DETERING: Yes. I get -- I get a report once every three months. And I have a quality score and I have a patient satisfaction score. And they are able to take data out of our computer system about, are my diabetics getting the right care? Are my heart care patients? Are my pregnant patients getting prenatal care? Are my -- all my women getting their paps and their mammograms? We are able to come up with a good score of all that stuff. And, if I am above a certain threshold, I get a -- I get a bonus. It's not huge, but it's an incentive to do well.
   
Replicating on a national scale

BETTY ANN BOWSER: Even supporters of Group Health acknowledge the system wouldn't be easy or cheap to replicate on a national level. It has taken Group Health 60 years to be able to compete with large insurance companies, and startup costs for a national co-op are likely to cost taxpayers more than $6 billion.

Even once it was started, it's not clear whether it would actually bring medical prices down. Professor Katz says, Group Health hasn't brought down medical expenditures in Washington State.

AARON KATZ: We're ranked 19th among states. And, so, there are states that have no co-ops, like California, Texas, Arizona, that are doing better than we are. So, it's not -- I don't think it's clear at all that the presence of Group Health has led to a very efficient, very effective marketplace. This is not to take anything away from Group Health. I don't think that's the question. Really, the question we should be trying to answer is, if Group Health is so good, how come they haven't spread like wildfire around the country? And the fact is, they haven't.

WOMAN: Now, what we're going to do is, we're going to repeat your echocardiogram

BETTY ANN BOWSER: In spite of such reservations, health co-ops are still expected to be very much a part of the health care discussion when lawmakers return from their summer recess.

JIM LEHRER: We have extended excerpts of Betty Ann's interviews and an explainer of how a co-op actually works at NewsHour.PBS.org.
 
Partial article
----------------------------------------------------------------------

DialysisEthics responsible for:

*2000 US Senate hearings

*Verified statistics on "Dialysis Facility Compare"

*Doctors have to review charts before they can be reimbursed

*2000 and 2003 Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports on the conditions in dialysis

*2007 - Members of DialysisEthics worked for certification of hemodialysis
technicians in Colorado - bill passed

*1999 to present - nonviolent dismissed patients returned to their
clinics or placed in other clinics or hospitals over the years

 

Blog #4: A Glimpse of Hell

Details
Written by: Super User
Category: Blog
Published: 01 April 2023
Hits: 1121
  • Tag: BillionaireRedemptionOrNot Blog


Intro
Petition (and see our visit to DC and DC Press Conference + Rally)

!!!P.S. The following History and recent Children's stats linked to, need to be emphasized!!! Update: And it gets worse:  KIDS!!!!

--------------------------------------------------------

Sometime back I checked my email after a day of raiding the supply train to dialysis land [1] (it may not be coincidence diabetes and dialysis have the word "DIE" in them)  In my email was a message from a friend who had a link to this article. The article concerns Berkshire’s Mr. Munger and Mr. Buffett’s hear-no-evil, see-no-evil style of investing. My imagination started running wild and I got a glimpse of Hell, actually the basement of Hell!!  (I hear things are a bit cooler there than the main floor)  It was Hell for a couple of gentleman I've mentioned!  And what did I see in that basement of Hell!  I saw a window!  And above that window what did I see!  I saw a sign!  And what did that sign say!  "Customer Complaints"  (There might have to be a 2nd sign: "Please Do Not Throw Hot Coals at the Staff!")

And as I left Hell's basement what else did I see?  I saw quite a few people lining up at the Buffett-Munger booths.  The first person in line was a former kidney dialysis patient.  I didn't catch the whole of the conversation, but I did hear: "And then I died!" and "what are you going to do about it!!!".

[1] I often link to that diabetes thread from Reddit

Huh, maybe when Mr. Munger and Mr. Buffett were buying things they should have looked under the hood?

(after reading that Munger-Buffett-Berkshire article, I had to put back up the bad Dad humor shield because my blood was boiling)

#Real Hell:
Betty Allen's
Frank Brown's

Petition (and see our visit to DC and DC Press Conference + Rally)

  1. 'Save the Billionaires (or not)' Walk
  2. Blog #3: Walk Plan
  3. Blog #2: Just a Song
  4. Blog #1: Intro

Page 4 of 5

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Facebook

Click the image and visit us on Facebook!
DE Facebook

Dialysis A. on Facebook

Click image to visit Dialysis Advocates on Facebook
Facebook Dialysis Advocates
Need Help? Click the image above.

Propublica on Facebook

Click image for Propublica's investigative reporting on Facebook.
Facebook Propublica
click this link for dialysis expose

Recommended Books

Click Image
Book Recommendations

Other Info

  • State Inspections
  • Lawsuits
  • More Info
  • Other Healthcare news
  • Recommended Books
  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?